SHRUTI
The primary source of Hinduism from
which it derives all its authority and inspiration is the body of literature
known as the vedas. They constitute the oldest religious literature of the
world. They consist of two main divisions, the Mantras and the Brahmanas – the former containing chants
and prayers and the latter containing a sort of commentary on the former, but
both having equal authority. All are eternal, being revelations to the Rishis.
A mantra may be in verse with fixed feet and syllables. Then it is known
as a Rik. Otherwise it is called Yajus. A rik that can be
sung is called a SAman. The three classes of mantras are grouped
into four compilations or SamhitAs. These are the four Vedas which have
the names Rg veda, Yajur-veda, SAmaveda, and atharvaveda.
Each SamhitaA had one or more Brahmanas
only a few of which are extant. Some of the Brahmanas
have a portion called AraNyaka in which are found one or more
Upanishads. The SamhitAs as well as the Brahmanas had various rescensions or ShAkhAs (branches)
according to the original Rishis to whom they were revealed, and after whom
they were named. We are told that there were 1180 such branches, but as of now
it appears there are only eleven.
The most interesting thing to note
is the fact that the Vedas were not written by any single person or persons. In
fact they were not 'written' at all, until, in the nineteenth century, they
were put into print. Till then, over the centuries, they were transmitted
orally. In fact, all traditional teaching in India has gone on in this way for
several centuries – from Guru to disciple (Shishya) from mouth to ear
and from heart to heart. It is one of the amazing miracles of world heritage
that, while even the written literature of great authors like Kalidasa and
Shakespeare have today more than one reading or version at several points, the Vedas,
which go back to 3000 B.C. have, in spite of being handed down entirely through
oral transmission, come down to us in a single version with a scrupulous
exactitude. Throughout the length and breadth of India , where the Vedas are
treasured as the most ancient heritage, not a syllable of them is different in
one place from what it is everywhere else.
How can this be? How was it
possible? In spite of their massive content, (Rg veda and Yajur veda
have 153,826 and 109,287 words respectively) they have been preserved from
generation to generation though it was all done only orally. All this has
been preserved (till today) for more than five millenia (at least three
millenia according to even the most stinting calculations) without ever putting
them into writing. This must be considered a great lingusitic achievement of
which India
should be legitimately proud. The literature, which consists of diverse
poetical and prose compositions were simply learnt by rote, the training being
given by the teacher saying each word or combinations of words once with the
proper incantations (called svaras) and the students saying it twice.
They then learn, almost in the same way, to recite it in continuous form
along with the incantations. The continuous recitation of a vedic text is
called samhita pATha. The accuracy of the transmitted text is
preserved by resorting to an artifice of nine different techniques or
modes of recital.
The first is the pada pATha,
which simply recites each word of the text separately; pada means word; pATha
means reading.The system of euphonic changes that occur from the samhita
pATha to the pada pATha is itself very technical (Sanskrit grammar
would be crucial here) but makes sense. In addition, there are eight other
techniques of recitation, the sole purpose of each is to preserve the original samhita
text without the loss or addtion of a single syllable or svara. The svaras
are a significant part of the recital of the vedas, whatever be the mode. The
eight modes are called: krama, jaTa, ghana , mAlA, ratha, ShikhA, daNDa
and rekhA. In each mode the order
of recital of the words is specified as a particular permutation of their
original sequence. We give below a sentence from the Yajurveda, obviously without the svaras, in its original samhita
pATha form, also its pada text and then the order of the words in
the ghana
recital. A pundit who has learnt the ghana recital of one
complete veda (he takes thirteen years of whole time work to reach that stage)
is called a Ghana-pAThi.
First we give the rule for the ghana
mechanics of recitation: Let us denote the original order of words in a
sentence as: 1/2/3/4/5. Then the ghana
recital will go as follows:
12/21/123/321/123/
23/32/234/432/234/
34/43/345/543/345/
45/54/45/ 5 iti 5.
Example: samhita sentence:
eshAm purushANAm-eshAm paSUnAM mA
bher-mA ro-mo eshAM kincanAmamat //
Meaning: Oh God! Do not frighten
these our men and animals, may none of these perish or lack health.
pada text:
(the slashes are shown to separate the words; but in reciting the pada
text, one gives a half-pause after each pada):
eshAM/purushANAM/eshAM/paSUnAM/mA/bheH/mA/arah/mo-iti-mo/eshAM/
kim/chana/Amamat/Amamad-ity-Amamat/
Note: The ninth break here and the
last break are the results of a technicality which the reader may ignore,
unless one wants to specialise in this art.
Now for the ghana recital (without the svaras;
with the svaras it would be a delight to hear). The recital is a
non-stop recital, except for a half-pause at the place shown by /. There is no
break anywhere else. The hyphens shown are for requirements of those who can
decipher the grammar; they will not be reflected in the recital.
eshAM-purushANAM-purushANAm-eshAm-eshAM purushANAm-eshAm-eshAm
purushANAm-eshAm-eshAm purushANAm-eshAM /
purushANAm-eshAm-eshAM purushANAM purushANAm-eshAM paSUnAM paSUnAm-eshAm
purushANAm purushANAm-eshAM paSUnAM /
eshAM paSUnAM paSUnAm-eshAm-eshAM paSUnAm-mA mA paSUnAm-eshAm-eshAM
paSUnAm-mA / paSUnAm-mA mA paSUnAM paSUnAm-mA
bher-bher-mA paSUnAM paSUnAm-mA bheH /
mA bher-bher-mA-mA bher-mA-mA bher-mA-mA bher-mA / bher-mA-mA bher-bher-mAro aro mA
bher-bher-mA araH / mA ro aro mA-mA ro
mo-mo aro mA mA ro mo / aro mo mo aro
aro mo eshAm-eshAm mo aro aro mo eshAM /
mo eshAm-eshAm mo mo eshAm kim kim-eshAm-mo mo eshAm kim / mo iti
mo/ eshAm kim-kim-eshAm-eshAM kim-cana
cana kim-esham-eshaM kim-cana / kim cana
cana kim kim canAmamad-Amamat cana kim kim canAmamat /canAmamad-Amamac-cana
canAmamat /Amamad-ityAmamat /
The significant point to note here
is that in Sanskrit the order of words does not matter for the meaning of the
sentence. If you do it with an English sentence, say, ‘Rama vanquished Ravana’,
it will go like this:
Rama
vanquished vanquished Rama Rama vanquished Ravana Ravana vanquished Rama Rama
vanquished Ravana … and so on.
You can now see the absurdity in the
meanings thrown up by the sequence of words. In Sanskrit this absurdity would
not arise. So a ghana
recitation is supposed to be equivalent to a recitation of the veda 13 times
and to that extent is multifold fruitful! The 13 is because except for two
beginning and two ending words in a sentence the others are repeated 13
times. (It can be checked with the word paSUnAM above).
Orthodox opinion holds that the
vedas are eternal. The significance of this will be understood only if the
concept of Time in Hindu cosmology is understood. In Hindu
cosmology and metaphysics it is not accepted that the universe was created out
of nothing at a particular point of time. For if something is created or born,
it has to be dissolved, has to die. Strictly the conservation principle applies
here. The universe was created, according to the Vedas, only by transformation
of something which was latent before that. For instance, one such Vedic
statement (M.N.U. 1-13) says: Sun & Moon were created by the Creator as
they were earlier.[1]
Creation is just a manifestation of
what was unmanifest before. SrshTi and SamhAra, Creation and
Dissolution, are only two events in a long cyclic succession of events. There
is no beginning or end. This alternation between manifestation and non-manife station is what
appears as the passage of time. Manifestation is when the universe of names and
forms appears and non-manifestation is when it disappears. The only Ultimate
Reality is Brahman. Even
BrahmA the Creator is only a manifestation of the Absolute Brahman at one point of time. He is the
womb from which the entire universe becomes manifest. He is the One into which
the entire universe dissolves. Each period of this manifestation is a day of BrahmA. From one day of BrahmA to another day, that is, from one
period of manifestation to another such, many things survive in their latent
forms. Among these are the Vedas – it is in this sense that the Vedas are eternal – and the complex of prints of individual minds with their store of
impressions called vAsanAs. These survive the ‘night’ of BrahmA,
the period of non-manifestation. The lengths of these days and nights in this
long cycle of events have been elaborately described in the scriptures. The
units mentioned therein are fantastically large and mind-boggling and a modern
mind may be tempted to dismiss them as concoctions. But the consistency with
which different scriptures written at different times in the past reveal the
magnitudes of these units, called yugas, is remarkable.
To be precise, a mahA-yuga, also called ‘chatur-yuga’, is an age or epoch. It consists
of four yugas which repeat in a cyclic order. Each cycle of four yugas
consists of
·
A KRta-yuga or Satya-yuga
of 1,728,000 human years;
·
a tretA-yuga of
1,296,000 human years,
·
a dvApara-yuga of
864,000 human years and
·
a kali-yuga of 432,000
human years.
Thus one mahA-yuga has a
duration of 4.32 million human years. 1008 such mahA-yugas make a day of
BrahmA and is called a kalpa. Cf. B.G. 8–17[2]:
Those who know the day of BrahmA as a thousand (mahA-) yugas
in duration … . We are told that in this recurrent cycle of yugas we are now in
kaliyuga which started in 3102 B.C.E. What is the proof, you may ask.
What is the proof that today is, say, Thursday? The only proof is that
yesterday was Wednesday. The proof that when you were born it was such and such
a day is that your mother told you it was so. Though Ind ia has been criticized for its
lack of historical sense, people in Ind ia
have been doing a good job in terms of keeping track of the calendar,
irrespective of the life-history of any ind ividual.
The rituals that every Hindu goes through, both on auspicious occasions like
marriage and (invariably) on inauspicious occasions like death always start
with the fixation of time and date in the age-old calendar. In fact those who
perform ritual worship daily cannot but be aware of the calendar. In this way
the exact date in the eternal cycle of the yugas has been passed on to us from generation
to generation.
Let us come to what the vedas talk
about. They talk about creation, Nature and God. They sing ecstatically about
the bounties of Mother Nature. They glorify the majesty that is transparent in
the workings of nature. They contain long, prosaic instructions on rituals to
be followed for propitiating various gods. They make impressive poetic appeals
to the grace of these gods. They discuss life and death and everything that
touches man in his journey through life. The subject matter of the vedas is
usually looked at in terms of three categories or parts, called kANDas,
technically. These three parts are not physically separated in the vedas.
Material relevant to all three subjects are scattered throughout the texts. The
karma kANDa discusses the
duties of an individual, particularly of a householder, the rites and
sacrifices that he must perform and how he should perform them. In the upAsana-kANDa
the theme is divine communion and worship. The jnAna-kANDa is
metaphysical disquisition about ultimate reality and the transience of ordinary
sensory experience. These excursions into metaphysics and philosophy
particularly occur in the last portions of the vedas, called the Upanishads.
For the meaning of the word ‘Upanishad’ see the name ‘hrImkAra-vedopanishad’
(#294) in 1.12.
Upanishads occur in the last
portions of each branch of each veda. From out of the 1180 branches that
are supposed to have existed 5000 years ago, at present only around 120
Upanishads are extant. Of these, ten are considered to be most fundamental.
These are: ISa, Kena, KaTha, PraSna, MunDaka, MANDUkya, TaittirIya,
Aitareya, ChAndogya, BRhadAraNyaka Upanishads. Note that in
referring to these Upanishads in this book we use the respective abbreviations :
I.U.; Ke.U.; Ka.U.; P.U.; Mu.U.; MA.U.; T.U.; A.U.; Ch.U.; Br.U.
Some other important Upanishads are:
ShvetASvatara, MaitrI, KausitikI, NRsimha-pUrva-tApinI, Kaivalya,
AmRta-bindu, etc. Over the centuries, the importance attached to the
different portions of the vedas has been shifting. In modern times it is the
Upanishads that make the strongest appeal. Some of them are very long and some
very short. The MA.U. has only twelve very short
paragraphs in prose. The Br.U. is as long as the Biblical
New Testament. Some Upanishads are in prose, some in verse. But all are
discourses and dialogues about spiritual experiences. These dwell on
fundamental questions about life, birth, death and man's ultimate objective.
What is the nature of the universe? What is meant by Absolute Reality? How was
the world created? What is man's place in the universe? What is the purpose of
his journey through life? What is knowledge? What are the means to acquire that
knowledge? How does one analyze one's mental experience? How does one reach the
state of everlasting bliss, if there is one? What is meant by God? What is
man’s relationship with God? All such questions are daringly posed and
relentlessly pursued. The theme usually ends up declaring:
THE DIVINE
IS ESSENTIALLY IN THE DEPTH OF ONE'S OWN SELF.
TAP IT. BE
IN CONSTANT TOUCH WITH IT.
RECOGNIZE
THAT DIVINITY IN THE SELF OF EVERY BEING.
ACT IN THE
LIVING PRESENT GUIDED BY THAT AWARENESS.
THAT IS THE
WAY TO BE HAPPY, EVER.
Many portions of the Upanishads have
been considered by philosophers all over the world to be the most profound
records of human thought. Upanishads are therefore considered to be the crown
jewel of the vedas. They tell us that we are not to wander everywhere in search
of God. No such quest will reveal Him. He stays very close to us. But we have
to transcend the very time and space which limit our vision. It is the
alternating states of the mind which are caused by the interplay of time and
space that delude us. They tell us to long to be free from the play of time and
space and ultimately realise the Truth by self-experience. For a detailed
account of the Upanishads see 6.3.
No comments:
Post a Comment